Introduction: A Disturbing Scene Unfolds
A chilling spectacle has gripped the Minnesota State Capitol in 2025: Satanists have erected a display thanking Governor Tim Walz for “not standing in the way of spreading Satanism” within the government’s heart. Alongside it, a pentagram-adorned “religious” exhibit stands as a bold statement, raising alarms about leadership and values in Walz’s Minnesota.
The Display: Satanists Praise Walz
The display, reported by journalist Liz Collin on X, features a plaque lauding Walz for enabling Satanism’s presence in the Capitol. Another post by Dustin Grage on X highlights a concurrent “religious” exhibit with a pentagram, cementing the controversy. Critics argue this isn’t mere free expression—it’s a governor’s failure to safeguard Minnesota’s moral fabric (Office of Governor Tim Walz).
NEW: A “thank you to Governor Walz” display is now up inside the Minnesota State Capitol. The sign thanks the Governor for “not standing in the way of spreading satanism inside the State Capitol Building.” pic.twitter.com/w60uljrqJP
— Liz Collin (@lizcollin) April 2, 2025
The satanists currently have a “religious” display in the Minnesota State Capitol.
— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) December 15, 2024
Welcome to Tim Walz’s Minnesota. pic.twitter.com/UMk8tUPKZL
A Clash of Values: Beyond Tolerance
Satanism, with its rejection of traditional order, clashes with the Judeo-Christian roots of American society. By allowing these displays, Walz isn’t just tolerating speech—he’s amplifying an ideology some see as anti-American. Far from a win for religious pluralism, detractors call it a sign of weakness or complicity, eroding the decency Minnesotans expect from their leaders.
What’s at Stake for Minnesota and Beyond?
Walz’s inaction has ignited a firestorm, with the Satanists’ gratitude serving as a red flag. As posts on X suggest, many view this as a deeper rot—leadership that shrugs at subversion under the guise of tolerance. Minnesota, and America, deserve better than a Capitol turned into a platform for chaos, critics say. Will Walz respond, or let the controversy fester into 2025?