The issue of mass immigration has sparked intense debate across Europe, and Poland is no exception. According to Professor Witold Modzelewski from the University of Warsaw, Poland cannot bear the financial and societal burdens of mass migration. In a recent interview, he outlined the staggering costs and cultural challenges, arguing that Poland must take a firm stance against accepting large numbers of migrants.
The Financial Burden of Immigration
In an interview on the FMC27NEWS YouTube channel, Prof. Witold Modzelewski provided a conservative estimate of the daily cost of supporting a migrant in Poland: 150 Polish zlotys (PLN), equivalent to approximately €35. This figure, he noted, is an underestimate, covering only basic needs such as food and accommodation.
“If we chose an assimilation policy... these people need to be provided with a place to stay... and covered by a state umbrella financing security services. It is an estimated PLN 150 per day. However, this is an underestimate,” said Prof. Modzelewski.
In countries like Germany, these costs are significantly higher due to elevated living expenses. Additional expenses, such as social welfare, medical care, integration programs, and education, further inflate the financial burden. Modzelewski emphasized that Poland lacks the resources to sustain such costs, stating, “Who can we take from to finance it? There is no one to take from.”
Poland’s Historical Context and Cultural Concerns
Prof. Modzelewski argued that Poland bears no responsibility for the colonial past of Western Europe, which he believes fuels resentment among some migrant populations. He described these groups as seeking “revenge” against Europe, driven by historical grievances.
“Their rebellion is today, but the motive is the past. And we cannot participate in this,” Modzelewski stated.
He firmly rejected the idea of Poland sharing collective responsibility for the historical actions of “Old Europe,” urging the country to distance itself from such narratives.
Growing Resistance to the EU Migration Pact
According to the Polish publication Do Rzeczy, a wave of protests is growing in Poland against the transfer of migrants from regions such as Africa and the Middle East. Public opinion polls consistently show strong opposition to open borders and mass migration. Despite this, the EU migration pact obligates Poland to accept hundreds of thousands of migrants in the coming years, intensifying domestic tensions.
Conclusion: A Firm Stance on Immigration
Professor Modzelewski’s remarks highlight the complex interplay of financial, cultural, and historical factors shaping Poland’s immigration policy. With limited resources and a distinct historical identity, Poland faces significant challenges in navigating the EU’s migration mandates. As debates continue, the country’s stance remains clear: mass immigration is neither affordable nor desirable.